↗ https://reddit.com/r/investing/comments/1pwjnpy/is_there_a_magic_number_where_roth_vs_traditional/
I understand the difference between a roth and a traditional for the most part but is there a magic number where it obviously makes sence to get a roth instead?
Like under $3 million expected at 65 you should just get a traditional and over you should get a roth.
Assuming im retiring at 65 and im gonna spend every penny of it before i die