**TURB is one I’m keeping a very close eye on.**
Yesterday this thing touched **$3.38** and now we’re back under $2.
That price action is crazy, but the reason I’m still interested has very little to do with yesterday’s candle.
The company just announced **\~$3.5M of firm orders across 15 energy-storage projects in Spain and Chile**, representing **15.6 MWh of storage and 5.95 MW of power capacity.**
And before anyone says “only $3.5M” — look at the bigger picture.
This is **in addition to the previously announced $53M / 366 MWh Pamesa industrial deployment.**
So we’re not talking about one random purchase order.
We’re starting to see a company build a portfolio of actual commercial and industrial deployments.
What caught my attention is the stage of these new projects:
**2 already operating**
**3 being installed**
**9 in manufacturing**
**1 under development**
That’s important to me because these aren’t just presentations and LOIs. The company says the portfolio is backed by binding purchase orders and/or executed supply agreements.
And the historical numbers make the story more interesting.
Turbo Energy reported roughly **$23.5M revenue for FY2025 — up 107% YoY.**
At the same time, its operating loss narrowed dramatically.
That doesn’t mean the company is profitable or that the stock is automatically undervalued. It isn’t.
But it’s enough to make me ask a different question:
**What happens if this growth continues and these contracts actually convert into revenue and cash?**
Because TURB isn’t trying to be just another battery seller.
Their model combines **battery storage + solar + energy management + AI/software**, essentially trying to make the storage system intelligent enough to decide when energy should be stored, used, shifted or supplied.
That’s where I think the long-term story gets interesting.
Industrial companies don’t buy batteries because batteries are cool.
They buy them because electricity costs money, peak demand costs money, outages cost money, and inefficient energy management costs money.
If Turbo’s technology can consistently save customers money and improve energy resilience, the value isn’t simply in the physical battery sitting at the site.
It’s in the system managing the energy.
And that’s a much bigger market.
**What I’m NOT ignoring**
This is still a microcap.
There are very real risks here.
The $3.5M announced today isn’t $3.5M of revenue booked tomorrow.
Pamesa execution needs to be watched.
Margins need to improve.
Cash flow matters.
And **dilution/financing is probably one of the biggest things shareholders need to keep an eye on.**
So I’m not here saying:
“$TURB to $10 guaranteed.”
That’s nonsense.
What I’m saying is that **sub-$2 pricing after yesterday’s $3.38 high has made me more interested in studying the company, not less.**
Because if the company executes on Pamesa, converts these C&I orders into revenue, continues winning customers and eventually builds recurring software/Energy-as-a-Service revenue, the investment story could look very different a year or two from now.
And if execution doesn’t happen, the market will eventually expose that too.
That’s why this one is interesting.
**$53M Pamesa.**
**$3.5M new firm orders.**
**366 MWh Pamesa.**
**15.6 MWh new C&I portfolio.**
**107% FY2025 revenue growth.**
Yet we’re sitting below $2 after touching $3.38 yesterday.
I’m not saying the market is wrong.
I’m saying **I want to understand why.**
Because sometimes the biggest opportunities aren’t found by staring at today’s share price.
They’re found by asking what the business could actually look like if management executes.
**TURB is officially on my serious watchlist.**
Do your own DD. This is a highly volatile microcap, not a guaranteed winner.