Blind valuation challenge: a large US consumer company, 5 numbers, no name. Cheap or expensive?

I'm trying a small experiment: judge a company only on its numbers, with no name or story to bias you.

Large-cap US consumer company. Data as of today (Oct 5):

1. **Earnings yield: 6.2%.** Profits are 6.2% of the share price per year (10y Treasury is \~4–5%).
2. **Return on capital: 34%.** It earns $34 of operating profit for every $100 of working capital + fixed assets it uses.
3. **Acquirer's Multiple: 12.1x.** Enterprise value / operating earnings (lower = cheaper). One close competitor trades at 7.5x; another is losing money at the operating level, so it has no meaningful multiple.
4. **FS-Score: 5/10.** Gray & Carlisle's 10-point version of the Piotroski F-Score (from *Quantitative Value*): profitability, balance sheet stability and operating improvements. Here: profitable and stable, but most operating trends are getting worse.
5. **DCF: fair value \~43% below today's price.** Assumes 5% growth for 10 years, 3% terminal growth, 12% discount rate. Free cash flow has been weakening.

**Your turn:** give each number a 🟢 🟡 or 🔴, and tell me which one decided it for you. Bonus points if you guess the company.

EDIT: Revealed in the comments!