Seriously considering getting into $DOT. Getting ready to take off.

**Linked post - https://x.com/altmasterroshi/status/2061194771339899008?s=46&t=sKMWngatJbmxwqAYexDy2A**

**Credit - @altmasterroshi**

**Coin X account - @usedotai**

**Chart - dexscreener.com/base/0x5f54757…**

**CA- 0x23A2847d772803f9EFC64B4277b782b06296FE51**

$DOT chart had a great recovery after shaking out the first wave of sellers

Now looking to flip resistance into support at 240k marketcap

I believe this is a great place to buy after the first big dip

The next leg looks inevitable at this point

240k marketcap is criminally undervalued for this $VVV competitor

One of the strongest privacy narratives out on @base right now

Read the thread attatched below on my thesis

People are starting to pick up on the idea that $DOT may just be a $VVV competitor

Why you ask?

Let’s talk about it:

$DOT and $VVV (Venice AI) are both privacy-first, uncensored AI platforms built around open-weight models on Base, targeting users who want AI chat/coding without data harvesting, heavy censorship, or corporate sycophancy. They share a core thesis: deliver high-quality inference that’s private by design, not just by policy

Venice.ai ($VVV) is the more established player—launched earlier (2024), with \~450k users, a \~$800M+ market cap at times, image/code/text gen, an API geared toward autonomous agents, and token utility centered on staking for yield (\~15%) or minting DIEM credits ($1/day of inference access). It emphasizes decentralized, censorship-resistant access via open models

Dot ($DOT) positions itself as the stricter, more verifiable evolution—especially with DotChat (live web chat) and DotCode (upcoming CLI). Here’s where it claims clear differentiation, based on its architecture, manifesto, and roadmap: