Posts  / NVDA  / #POST-237866
REDDIT

NVIDIA just had its best quarter ever. Here's why the stock doesn't care.

The short answer: **everyone who can buy it already owns it,** and the revenue lines that would force a model revision haven't printed in a quarterly filing yet.

The long answer: On May 20, NVIDIA reported $81.6B revenue, up 85% YoY. $91B Q2 guide. $48.6B free cash flow in a single quarter. Stock was at $220 pre-earnings. Sitting at $200 now.

Before anyone says priced in, I think this one is more specific than that.

On the call Jensen said verbatim:

>"The $20 billion is for stand-alone CPU."

Then separately when asked what sits above the $1 trillion Blackwell and Rubin demand signal:

>"we didn't include any Vera CPU, stand-alone CPU in that number. And so I expect that to be the second largest."

FY2028 consensus moved from $491B to $551.7B after the print. That captured the $91B guide extrapolated forward. It did not build a discrete Vera CPU line **because sell-side models require a historical 10-Q line to anchor from.** Vera CPU has never appeared in one. **A blank cell requires an assumption with no data behind it.**

The ownership structure makes the stock unresponsive even to this. Consensus moved up $60B. 36 of 37 analysts have Buy ratings. Price targets raised across the board. Stock still down 10%. **At 8.3% of the S&P 500 and 78% active fund ownership, every fund that can own it already does.** The incremental buyer is index flows and retail. Neither reads the transcript.

On the bear case: the Q1 10-Q introduced the ACIE vs Hyperscale split for the first time. ACIE $37.4B, Hyperscale $37.9B. **ACIE grew 31% QoQ, Hyperscale grew 12%.** The custom silicon displacement thesis requires Hyperscale dominant and accelerating. **Two numbers say the opposite.**

So what actually moves the stock? The upgrades since May 20 are guide extrapolation. **The upgrade that moves the stock is when Vera CPU appears in a 10-Q** and every analyst rebuilds their model around a segment that's never existed before. That's a structural revision. Q4 FY2027 at earliest, Q1 FY2028 more likely.

Full writeup with primary sources here: [https://substack.com/home/post/p-203242044](https://substack.com/home/post/p-203242044)

Pushback welcome.

Post image